Summary
In Bondurant v. United States, No. 2:05CV176, 2006 WL 691320, at *3 (M.D. Ala. Mar. 17, 2006), the District Court for the Middle District of Alabama similarly decided that certain physical ailments were not extraordinary circumstances and did not warrant equitable tolling.
Summary of this case from U.S. v. BronsonOpinion
Civil Action No. 2:05CV176-MHT (WO).
March 17, 2006
JUDGMENT
In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court:
(1) Petitioner's objections (Doc. No. 17) are overruled.
(2) The United States Magistrate Judge's recommendation (Doc. No. 16) is adopted.
(3) The petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. No. 1) is denied as time-barred.
It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed against petitioner, for which execution may issue.
The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.