From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bolte v. City of New York

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 14, 1968
239 N.E.2d 653 (N.Y. 1968)

Opinion

Argued May 29, 1968

Decided June 14, 1968

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, JOHN L. FLYNN, J.

Arthur N. Seiff and Harry H. Lipsig for appellant.

J. Lee Rankin, Corporation Counsel ( L. Michael Rudolph and Stanley Buchsbaum of counsel), for City of New York, respondent.

David S. Konheim for Broadway Maintenance Corp., respondent.


Order reversed, with costs to abide the event, and a new trial granted on the ground that there was sufficient evidence to submit to the jury. No opinion.

Concur: Judges BURKE, SCILEPPI, KEATING and BREITEL. Chief Judge FULD and Judges BERGAN and JASEN dissent and vote to affirm on the opinion at the Appellate Division.


Summaries of

Bolte v. City of New York

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 14, 1968
239 N.E.2d 653 (N.Y. 1968)
Case details for

Bolte v. City of New York

Case Details

Full title:LUCY BOLTE, as Administratrix of the Estate of GUSTAVE BOLTE, Deceased…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jun 14, 1968

Citations

239 N.E.2d 653 (N.Y. 1968)
239 N.E.2d 653
292 N.Y.S.2d 912

Citing Cases

Spano v. County of Onondaga

We disagree. It is well settled that a plaintiff is entitled to the most favorable view of the evidence and…

Ruocco v. L-K Bennett Enters., LLC

rovide plaintiff with a safe scaffold or ladder while he sandblasted railroad cars, and such failure was a…