From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bollten v. New York Contracting Company

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Nov 25, 1913
103 N.E. 1121 (N.Y. 1913)

Opinion

Submitted November 17, 1913

Decided November 25, 1913

Ira Skutch for motion.

James A. Deering opposed.


Motion denied if defendants, within twenty days, stipulate that if judgment shall be affirmed in the case of Lincoln Safe Deposit Company v. City of New York, the respondent may take judgment of affirmance ex parte in this case. On failure to give such stipulation the motion to dismiss this appeal is granted and the appeal dismissed, with costs and ten dollars costs of motion.


Summaries of

Bollten v. New York Contracting Company

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Nov 25, 1913
103 N.E. 1121 (N.Y. 1913)
Case details for

Bollten v. New York Contracting Company

Case Details

Full title:MARTIN BOLLTEN, Respondent, v . NEW YORK CONTRACTING COMPANY et al.…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Nov 25, 1913

Citations

103 N.E. 1121 (N.Y. 1913)
103 N.E. 1121

Citing Cases

Susswein v. Bradley Contracting Co.

Upon this theory the defendant, appellant, interfered with and trespassed upon the easements of the…