From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bolden v. Colvin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 2, 2015
CASE NO. 14CV1380 BEN (JMA) (S.D. Cal. Feb. 2, 2015)

Opinion

CASE NO. 14CV1380 BEN (JMA)

02-02-2015

PHINEAS C. BOLDEN, Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


ORDER:

(1) ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

(2) GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS

[Docket Nos. 11, 12]

On June 5, 2014, Plaintiff Phineas C. Bolden commenced an action seeking judicial review of a denial of disability benefits. (Docket No. 1.) Defendant Commissioner of Social Security filed a Motion to Dismiss the Complaint as untimely on August 25, 2014 . (Docket No. 11.) Plaintiff did not oppose the motion. On December 11, 2014, Magistrate Judge Jan M. Adler issued a thoughtful and thorough Report and Recommendation recommending that Defendant's Motion to Dismiss be granted. (Docket No. 12). Any objections to the Report and Recommendation were due December 30, 2014. (Id.) Neither party has filed any objections. For the reasons that follow, the Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED.

A district judge "may accept, reject, or modify the recommended disposition" of a magistrate judge on a dispositive matter. FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b)(3); see also 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). "The district judge must determine de novo any part of the [report and recommendation] that has been properly objected to." FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b)(3). However, "[t]he statute makes it clear that the district judge must review the magistrate judge's findings and recommendations de novo if objection is made, but not otherwise." United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (emphasis in original); see also Wang v. Masaitis, 416 F.3d 992, 1000 n.13 (9th Cir. 2005). "Neither the Constitution nor the statute requires a district judge to review, de novo, findings and recommendations that the parties themselves accept as correct." Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d at 1121.

In the absence of any objections, the Court fully ADOPTS Judge Adler's Report and Recommendation. Defendant's Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED. Plaintiff's Complaint is DISMISSED. The Clerk shall close the file.

IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: 2/2/15

/s/_________

HON. ROGER T. BENITEZ

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Bolden v. Colvin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 2, 2015
CASE NO. 14CV1380 BEN (JMA) (S.D. Cal. Feb. 2, 2015)
Case details for

Bolden v. Colvin

Case Details

Full title:PHINEAS C. BOLDEN, Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Commissioner of Social…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Feb 2, 2015

Citations

CASE NO. 14CV1380 BEN (JMA) (S.D. Cal. Feb. 2, 2015)

Citing Cases

Kindschy v. Berryhill

"However, a statute of limitations defense may be raised in a motion to dismiss and a claim may be dismissed…

Michael T. v. Saul

For this reason, "courts have dismissed actions filed only days after the expiration of this statute of…