From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bokinsky v. Bokinsky

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jul 23, 1999
742 So. 2d 809 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

Opinion

No. 98-03059.

Opinion filed July 23, 1999.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Polk County; William Bruce Smith, Judge.

John F. Wendel and Thomas J. DeBari of Wendel, Chritton, Parks DeBari, Chartered, Lakeland, for Appellant.

Mia L. McKown of Troiano Roberts, P.A., Lakeland, for Appellee.


Richard J. Bokinsky (the Father) appeals the final order denying his petition to modify his child support obligation. We affirm.

The Father contends that the trial court erred by determining that he was voluntarily unemployed and by imputing income without following the dictates of section 61.30(2)(b), Florida Statutes (1997). We disagree. The record supports that the Father's voluntary decision to not return to work after being released by his doctor, resulting in significant loss of income, was not a valid basis for downward modification of child support under the reasoning of Overbey v. Overbey, 698 So.2d 811 (Fla. 1997). Further, the record in this case supports that the Father was capable of working following his release by his physician.

Affirmed.

PARKER, A.C.J., and BLUE and STRINGER, JJ., Concur.


Summaries of

Bokinsky v. Bokinsky

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jul 23, 1999
742 So. 2d 809 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)
Case details for

Bokinsky v. Bokinsky

Case Details

Full title:RICHARD J. BOKINSKY, Appellant, v. LINDA L. BOKINSKY, n/k/a LINDA L…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Jul 23, 1999

Citations

742 So. 2d 809 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

Citing Cases

Gray v. Secretary, Department of Corrections

On September 17, 1999, the court granted the motion. Gray v. State, 742 So. 2d 809 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999). On…

Department of Revenue v. Jackson

The situation presented in Mascola is very similar to the circumstance where the parent has become…