From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Boileau v. De Cecco

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jun 10, 1974
65 N.J. 234 (N.J. 1974)

Opinion

Argued May 21, 1974 —

Decided June 10, 1974.

Mr. Arthur Montano argued the cause for appellants ( Messrs. Kisselman, Deighan, Montano Summers, attorneys; Mr. Gary L. Jacobs on the brief).

Mr. Leonard W. Moss argued the cause for respondent ( Messrs. Moss, Thatcher Moss, attorneys).


The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed by the Appellate Division, 125 N.J. Super. 263. For affirmance — Chief Justice HUGHES, and Justices JACOBS, HALL, MOUNTAIN, SULLIVAN, PASHMAN and CLIFFORD — 7.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

Boileau v. De Cecco

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jun 10, 1974
65 N.J. 234 (N.J. 1974)
Case details for

Boileau v. De Cecco

Case Details

Full title:DONNA BOILEAU, DONNA BOILEAU AS ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF MAURICE…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: Jun 10, 1974

Citations

65 N.J. 234 (N.J. 1974)
323 A.2d 449

Citing Cases

Walker v. City of Scottsdale

The New Jersey courts have long held that New Jersey's recreational use statute does not apply to land…

Toogood v. St. Andrews Condo. Ass'n

The term "premises" in Section 3a is not defined. In Boileau v. DeCecco, 125 N.J. Super. 263, 310 A.2d 497…