From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bohling v. Bronson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 1, 1909
130 App. Div. 895 (N.Y. App. Div. 1909)

Opinion

February, 1909.

Present — Ingraham, McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ.


We think the defendant was entitled to information as to the present whereabouts of the plaintiff before she should be compelled to try the action. The order should be reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion granted requiring the plaintiff's attorney to inform the defendant's attorney as to the present address of the plaintiff. All proceedings on the part of the plaintiff are stayed until twenty days after such information is given.


Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted as stated in opinion; proceedings in the meantime stayed. Settle order on notice.


Summaries of

Bohling v. Bronson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 1, 1909
130 App. Div. 895 (N.Y. App. Div. 1909)
Case details for

Bohling v. Bronson

Case Details

Full title:JOHN P. BOHLING, Respondent, v . SARA G. BRONSON, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Feb 1, 1909

Citations

130 App. Div. 895 (N.Y. App. Div. 1909)

Citing Cases

Dike v. Dike

client where the purpose of the disclosure is: (1) making service of a court order, Markevich v. Royal Ins.…