Opinion
Civil Action No. 2:06cv231-MHT (WO).
February 19, 2008
ORDER
The magistrate judge filed a recommendation (Doc. #19) to which no timely objections have been filed. After a review of the recommendation, and after an independent and de novo review of the entire record, the court believes that the recommendation should be adopted. Accordingly, it is
ORDERED that the recommendation (Doc. #19) of the magistrate judge is ADOPTED; the petition for writ of habeas corpus is DENIED, as it was not filed within the one-year period of limitation contained in 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1); and this case is DISMISSED with prejudice.
An appropriate judgment will be entered.