From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bobbitt v. Walker

United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Statesville Division
Mar 14, 2006
5:01CV36-1-MU (W.D.N.C. Mar. 14, 2006)

Opinion

5:01CV36-1-MU.

March 14, 2006


ORDER


THIS MATTER comes before the Court upon the Petitioner's Motion to Reconsider, filed August 30, 2005.

On July 11, 2001, this Court dismissed Petitioner's federal habeas petition on the basis that it was untimely. On October 17, 2001, the United State Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed this Court's ruling. Now, after numerous other attempts to change the outcome of his case, Petitioner asks the Court to rule that his federal habeas petition was timely. As stated above, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit has upheld this Court's ruling that Petitioner's federal habeas petition was untimely. This Court lacks jurisdiction to now rule on that issue. THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner's Motion to Reconsider is DENIED.


Summaries of

Bobbitt v. Walker

United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Statesville Division
Mar 14, 2006
5:01CV36-1-MU (W.D.N.C. Mar. 14, 2006)
Case details for

Bobbitt v. Walker

Case Details

Full title:KENNETH D. BOBBITT, Petitioner, v. DEAN WALKER, et al., Respondent

Court:United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Statesville Division

Date published: Mar 14, 2006

Citations

5:01CV36-1-MU (W.D.N.C. Mar. 14, 2006)

Citing Cases

Ragland v. Craig

The chancellor held that the testator intended by said Item 3 of his will to devise to complainant only his…

Duncan v. Peebles

The complainant's contention is that she was not put to an election because she had a valid claim or interest…