From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Board of Univ. of Alabama v. Garrett

U.S.
Apr 17, 2000
529 U.S. 1065 (2000)

Summary

granting certiorari on the issue of "[w]hether the Eleventh Amendment to the United States Constitution bars suits by private citizens in federal court under the Americans With Disabilities Act against non-consenting states"

Summary of this case from Perry v. Pennsylvania

Opinion

No. 99-1240.

April 17, 2000.


ORDER

C.A. 11th Cir. Certiorari granted limited to Question 1 presented by the petition. Reported below: 193 F. 3d 1214.


Summaries of

Board of Univ. of Alabama v. Garrett

U.S.
Apr 17, 2000
529 U.S. 1065 (2000)

granting certiorari on the issue of "[w]hether the Eleventh Amendment to the United States Constitution bars suits by private citizens in federal court under the Americans With Disabilities Act against non-consenting states"

Summary of this case from Perry v. Pennsylvania

granting certiorari to address whether states have Eleventh Amendment immunity from claims brought under the ADA

Summary of this case from Parker v. Universidad de Puerto Rico

granting cert. with respect "to Question 1 presented by the petition"

Summary of this case from Rainey v. Cty. of Deleware

granting certiorari on this issue

Summary of this case from Singer v. Wackenhut Corrections Corp.

In Garrett, the Court held that suits against states seeking monetary damages under Title I of the ADA are barred by the Eleventh Amendment.

Summary of this case from Patrick W. v. Lemahieu
Case details for

Board of Univ. of Alabama v. Garrett

Case Details

Full title:BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA ET AL. v. GARRETT ET AL

Court:U.S.

Date published: Apr 17, 2000

Citations

529 U.S. 1065 (2000)
120 S. Ct. 1669

Citing Cases

Townsel v. Missouri

Amendment immunity); Kazmier v. Widmann, 225 F.3d 519, 527-29 (5th Cir. 2000) (section of FMLA allowing leave…

Serafin v. Conn. Dept. of Ment. Health Addiction

In its initial ruling denying the motion to dismiss the plaintiffs' FMLA claim, the Court cited Jolliffe v.…