From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Board of the Black River Regulating District v. Ogsbury

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 17, 1923
139 N.E. 751 (N.Y. 1923)

Opinion

Argued March 12, 1923

Decided April 17, 1923

Henry Purcell and A.H. Cowie for appellant.

Nathan L. Miller and H. Bartow Farr for respondent.


Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: HISCOCK, Ch. J., HOGAN, CARDOZO, McLAUGHLIN, CRANE and ANDREWS, JJ. Absent: POUND, J.


Summaries of

Board of the Black River Regulating District v. Ogsbury

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 17, 1923
139 N.E. 751 (N.Y. 1923)
Case details for

Board of the Black River Regulating District v. Ogsbury

Case Details

Full title:BOARD OF THE BLACK RIVER REGULATING DISTRICT, Respondent, v . WILSON D…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Apr 17, 1923

Citations

139 N.E. 751 (N.Y. 1923)
139 N.E. 751

Citing Cases

BLACK RIV. REG. DIST. v. Adirondack League Club

The plaintiffs' answer, as taken from their brief, is "that if the Stokes Act is unconstitutional we may…

Black Riv. Reg. Dist. v. Adirondack League Club

The plaintiffs' answer, as taken from their brief, is "that if the Stokes Act is unconstitutional we may…