Summary
In Board of Educ. v Lakeland Federation of Teachers (42 N.Y.2d 853), there was no provision in the collective bargaining agreement dealing with the subject matter of the dispute, except for one provision setting forth the compensation for home instruction if and when assigned.
Summary of this case from Port Washington Union Free School District v. Port Washington Teachers Ass'nOpinion
Argued May 3, 1977
Decided June 7, 1977
Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, P. RAYMOND SIRIGNANO, J.
Murray Steyer for appellant.
Thomas C. Greble and James R. Sandner for respondent.
Order reversed, with costs, and stay of arbitration granted. The arbitration provision of the collective bargaining agreement in this case is illustrative of a limited or restricted arbitration clause despite its length. For that reason, we reverse on the opinion of Mr. Justice P. RAYMOND SIRIGNANO at Special Term.
Concur: Chief Judge BREITEL and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and COOKE.