From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Board of Educ. v. Ambach

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 29, 1980
49 N.Y.2d 986 (N.Y. 1980)

Summary

In Board of Educ. v Ambach (49 N.Y.2d 986, cert denied 449 U.S. 874), the Court of Appeals, referring to plaintiffs' challenge to a decision by the New York State Department of Education, cited Solnick v Whalen (supra), when it declared that that action should be dismissed as time barred.

Summary of this case from Matter of Bonar v. Shaffer

Opinion

Argued March 25, 1980

Decided April 29, 1980

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Third Judicial Department, EDWARD S. CONWAY, J.

Kenneth Pawson, Robert D. Stone and Louis H.J. Welch for appellant.

Edward A. O'Hara, III, and Marc H. Reitz for respondents.


MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, with costs, and the complaint dismissed.

Plaintiffs' action should be dismissed as being time-barred. In this action, plaintiffs seek review of the Department of Education's determination limiting State aid reimbursement for the cost of acquiring facilities from the State Dormitory Authority (see Education Law, § 1950, subd 13) by utilizing the cost allowance scheme set forth in subdivision 6 of section 3602 of the Education Law. Although this action is one for a declaratory judgment, inasmuch as the resolution of rights sought by the parties could have been obtained in a CPLR article 78 proceeding, the applicable Statute of Limitations is the four-month statute governing proceedings under article 78. (Solnick v Whalen, 49 N.Y.2d 224.)

Here, plaintiffs learned of the Department of Education's determination to limit reimbursement by utilizing cost allowances on May 24, 1976, at a meeting with officials of the Education Department's division of finance. Certainly, the right to institute this action would have accrued no later than September 15, 1976, the date upon which the first reimbursement payment, reflecting cost allowances, was made. Thus, the instant action, commenced some 10 months thereafter, must be deemed time-barred.

Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and MEYER concur in memorandum.

Order reversed, etc.


Summaries of

Board of Educ. v. Ambach

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 29, 1980
49 N.Y.2d 986 (N.Y. 1980)

In Board of Educ. v Ambach (49 N.Y.2d 986, cert denied 449 U.S. 874), the Court of Appeals, referring to plaintiffs' challenge to a decision by the New York State Department of Education, cited Solnick v Whalen (supra), when it declared that that action should be dismissed as time barred.

Summary of this case from Matter of Bonar v. Shaffer
Case details for

Board of Educ. v. Ambach

Case Details

Full title:BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE ALTMAR-PARISH-WILLIAMSTOWN CENTRAL SCHOOL…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Apr 29, 1980

Citations

49 N.Y.2d 986 (N.Y. 1980)
429 N.Y.S.2d 167
406 N.E.2d 1061

Citing Cases

New York State Elec. Gas v. Saranac Power

Of course, the Court is cognizant of the fact that to the extent that resolution of NYSEG's alleged rights…

Matter of Econ. Opportunity Comm. v. Shaffer

As the article 78 proceeding was commenced within four months of that date, it was timely. The case of Board…