From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bly v. Southern Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Virginia
Jan 15, 1945
32 S.E.2d 659 (Va. 1945)

Opinion

38270 Record No. 2870.

Upon Rehearing. January 15, 1945.

The original opinion is reported ante, page 162. — REPORTER. (This footnote appears as footnote * in the original text.)

Present, All the Justices.

MASTER AND SERVANT — Duty to Provide Safe Place to Work — General Rule. — An employer owes to the employee the duty to exercise ordinary care that the place in which the servant is required to work be reasonably safe.

Error to a judgment of the. Circuit Court of Shenandoah county. Hon. B. P. Harrison, judge presiding.

Reversed and remanded.

F. S. Tavenner, F. S. Tavenner, Jr., and N.W. Borden, for the plaintiff in error.

Thomas B. Gay and Armstrong Weaver, for the defendant in error.


Upon the petition of the defendant in error a rehearing was granted and the case re-argued at the present session of the court. After a careful consideration of the questions involved, we are constrained to adhere to our former opinion that the judgment of the lower court should be reversed and a new trial awarded on all issues. It is so ordered.

The petition for a rehearing suggests that certain language in our former opinion is calculated to impose upon the employer a higher duty to the employee than is required under settled principles. It is unnecessary that the language criticized be detailed. Suffice it to say that nothing in our former opinion was intended to change or impinge upon the elementary rule that an employer owes to the employee the duty to exercise ordinary care that the place in which the servant is required to work be reasonably safe.

Reversed and remanded.


Summaries of

Bly v. Southern Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Virginia
Jan 15, 1945
32 S.E.2d 659 (Va. 1945)
Case details for

Bly v. Southern Railway Co.

Case Details

Full title:LUCY M. BLY, ADMINISTRATRIX, ETC. v. SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY

Court:Supreme Court of Virginia

Date published: Jan 15, 1945

Citations

32 S.E.2d 659 (Va. 1945)
32 S.E.2d 659

Citing Cases

King v. Island Creek Coal Co.

However, the question of duty was not discussed in the opinion and it is apparent that the employer owed a…

Dao v. Faustin

In Counts 11 and 12, plaintiffs each bring claims of negligence separate from the negligent infliction of…