From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

B.L.W. Rlty. Holding v. Socony Mobil Oil

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 23, 1970
259 N.E.2d 500 (N.Y. 1970)

Opinion

Argued April 8, 1970

Decided April 23, 1970

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, DARWIN W. TELESFORD, J.

Roy M. Lazarus and Joseph Karow for appellant-respondent.

Charles F. McMorrow for respondent-appellant.

Herbert C. Smyth for respondent.


Order affirmed, with costs to respondent Socony Mobil Oil Company, Inc.

APPEAL by defendant Sixty East 88th Street Holding Corp., from so much of the Appellate Division order as directed judgment in favor of plaintiff against said defendant and directed an assessment of damages, dismissed upon the ground that the order in that respect does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution. No opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge FULD and Judges BURKE, SCILEPPI, BERGAN, BREITEL, JASEN and GIBSON.


Summaries of

B.L.W. Rlty. Holding v. Socony Mobil Oil

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 23, 1970
259 N.E.2d 500 (N.Y. 1970)
Case details for

B.L.W. Rlty. Holding v. Socony Mobil Oil

Case Details

Full title:B.L.W. REALTY HOLDING CO., INC., Appellant-Respondent, v. SOCONY MOBIL OIL…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Apr 23, 1970

Citations

259 N.E.2d 500 (N.Y. 1970)
259 N.E.2d 500
311 N.Y.S.2d 36

Citing Cases

Williams v. Mobil Oil Corp.

That argument attempts to renew a battle that subsided some years ago (Levine v. Shell Oil Co., 28 N.Y.2d…

Rozner v. Resolute Paper Prods

The duty exists by contract, but if the promisor does nothing, he cannot be held liable in tort to a third…