From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Blumenthal v. Picture Classics, Inc.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jan 10, 1933
185 N.E. 713 (N.Y. 1933)

Opinion

Argued November 30, 1932

Decided January 10, 1933

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

David Vorhaus and Alfred Beekman for appellants.

Jay Leo Rothschild and Harry Roter for respondent.


Order affirmed, with costs. First question certified not answered. Second question certified answered in the affirmative. No opinion.

Concur: POUND, Ch. J., CRANE, LEHMAN, O'BRIEN, HUBBS and CROUCH, JJ. Dissenting: KELLOGG, J.


Summaries of

Blumenthal v. Picture Classics, Inc.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jan 10, 1933
185 N.E. 713 (N.Y. 1933)
Case details for

Blumenthal v. Picture Classics, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:MIRIAM BLUMENTHAL, Respondent, v. PICTURE CLASSICS, INC., et al.…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jan 10, 1933

Citations

185 N.E. 713 (N.Y. 1933)
185 N.E. 713

Citing Cases

University of Notre Dame Du Lac v. Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp.

Apart from the publisher's concession that the use of the name was "essential", the number of times it was…

University, N D v. 20th Century-Fox

The means employed cannot change the nature of the legal wrong perpetrated; the medium of speech cannot, even…