From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Blume v. McMullen

Supreme Court of Florida. Division A
May 23, 1944
18 So. 2d 31 (Fla. 1944)

Opinion

May 23, 1944

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Suwannee County, Hal W. Adams, Judge.

J.W. Blackwell and J.W. Bryson, for appellant.

Wm. Randall Slaughter, for appellees.


Appellant secured a decree by virtue of Sec. 196.01 F.S. '41, F.S.A., to reduce his real estate assessment to $2.50 per acre for the year 1942. Thereupon he paid the taxes and sought to redeem all previous taxes then in arrears based upon a valuation of $2.50 per acre. He relied upon Sec. 194.10 F.S. '41, FSA, as authority to redeem upon the last and lowest valuation fixed. The clerk refused to allow the redemption on that basis because the last valuation of $2.50 per acre was not made by the tax assessor but was made by the court and as such was not a legal assessment whereupon appellant filed a bill to compel the redemption and the chancellor dismissed the bill and he appeals.

The question is whether the assessment of $2.50 per acre for 1942 was made by the court or the tax assessor. We are of the opinion that the assessment was that of the assessor. The effect of the court's action in reducing the assessment was to eliminate the illegal portion of the assessment and leave the remainder as the assessor's assessment. When the court decrees what is a proper valuation then that becomes the legally assessed value of the property and is in law the assessor's valuation. See West Virginia Hotel Corp. v. Foster Co., 101 Fla. 1147, 132 So. 842; County of Jackson v. Thornton, 44 Fla. 610, 33 So. 291.

The decree appealed from is reversed for further proceedings.

Reversed.

BUFORD, C. J., TERRELL and CHAPMAN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Blume v. McMullen

Supreme Court of Florida. Division A
May 23, 1944
18 So. 2d 31 (Fla. 1944)
Case details for

Blume v. McMullen

Case Details

Full title:J. W. BLUME v. J. L. McMULLEN, as Clerk of the Circuit Court in and for…

Court:Supreme Court of Florida. Division A

Date published: May 23, 1944

Citations

18 So. 2d 31 (Fla. 1944)
18 So. 2d 31

Citing Cases

Palm Springs Development v. Dade Cty

"* * * Obviously a portion of the assessment was legal and valid and likewise a portion was invalid by reason…

Overstreet v. Chatlos

See also City of Pensacola v. Pensacola A.R.R. Co. (1885), 21 Fla. 492, where a similar question was treated…