From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Blue v. Skolnik

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Jun 3, 2013
520 F. App'x 603 (9th Cir. 2013)

Opinion

No. 12-17394 D.C. No. 3:11-cv-00010-LRH-VPC

06-03-2013

ROBERT BLUE, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. HOWARD SKOLNIK; et al., Defendants - Appellees.


NOT FOR PUBLICATION


MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.


Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Nevada

Edward C. Reed, Senior District Judge, Presiding

Before: O'SCANNLAIN, W. FLETCHER, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.

Plaintiff Robert Blue appeals pro se the district court's denial of his request for preliminary injunctive relief against defendant prison officials. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)(1), and we affirm.

Our sole inquiry is whether the district court abused its discretion in denying preliminary injunctive relief, and we conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion. Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, 555 U.S. 7, 24 (2008) (listing factors for district court to consider); Sports Form, Inc. v. United Press Int'l, 686 F.2d 750, 752-53 (9th Cir. 1982) (explaining limited scope of review).

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Blue v. Skolnik

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Jun 3, 2013
520 F. App'x 603 (9th Cir. 2013)
Case details for

Blue v. Skolnik

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT BLUE, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. HOWARD SKOLNIK; et al., Defendants…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Jun 3, 2013

Citations

520 F. App'x 603 (9th Cir. 2013)