From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Blount v. Simmons

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Feb 1, 1896
23 S.E. 923 (N.C. 1896)

Opinion

(February Term, 1896.)

PRACTICE — COSTS OF ACTION IN NAME OF STATE — COUNTY NOT LIABLE.

Where, in an action by the solicitor in the name of the State to vacate an oyster-bed entry, the plaintiff was nonsuited, it was error to tax the costs against the county, which was not a party to the action.

ACTION heard before McIver, J., at Fall Term, 1894, of PAMLICO, against the defendant, W. S. Simmons, and 693 (10) other defendants in separate actions, upon the same causes of action, under and by virtue of chapter 287, Laws 1893, sec. 4, to vacate the said 694 entries in said chapter and section. His Honor having intimated that, under the case of S. v. Spencer, 114 N.C. 770, said cause of action could not be sustained, it appearing to the court that the same facts are involved in said 694 actions as recited in said case, the solicitor on behalf of the State submitted to a nonsuit, and, upon motion of said solicitor, a judgment for the costs of the said 694 actions was rendered against the county of Pamlico.

From so much of said judgment as taxed the cost against the county of Pamlico the Board of Commissioners of Pamlico County appealed.

F. M. Simmons and T. B. Womack for defendant.

No counsel contra.


This is an action by the State, on relation of the solicitor of the district, to vacate an oyster-bed entry, under Laws 1893, ch. 287, sec. 4, and upon the hearing his Honor being of opinion, on the authority of S. v. Spencer, 114 N.C. 770, that the plaintiff is not entitled to recover, the plaintiff submitted to a nonsuit, and, on motion of the solicitor, judgment was entered against the county of Pamlico for the costs of the action, said county not being then a party to the action, but was allowed to become a party for the purpose of an appeal. The plaintiff assigns no reason or authority why the county should be taxed with the costs, and we can see none. The defendant refers to The Code, secs. 536 and 537, and Bunting v. (11) Comrs., 74 N.C. 633, in its behalf.

Judgment Reversed.

Cited: S. c., 119 N.C. 51; S. v. Horne, ib., 855; Garner v. Worth, 122 N.C. 255; Loven v. Parson, 127 N.C. 302; Summerlin v. Morrisey, 168 N.C. 410.


Summaries of

Blount v. Simmons

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Feb 1, 1896
23 S.E. 923 (N.C. 1896)
Case details for

Blount v. Simmons

Case Details

Full title:STATE ON THE RELATION OF J. H. BLOUNT, SOLICITOR, v. W. S. SIMMONS

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Feb 1, 1896

Citations

23 S.E. 923 (N.C. 1896)
118 N.C. 9

Citing Cases

Blount v. Simmons

At Fall Term, 1894, upon the hearing, the Court being of opinion, on the authority of S. v. Spencer, 114 N.C.…

Summerlin v. Morrisey

The commissioner is not a party to this action and has no personal interest whatever in the subject of it. It…