From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Blount v. Johnston

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Dec 1, 1804
5 N.C. 36 (N.C. 1804)

Opinion

December Term, 1804.

The words of this will indicate no intention to give the executor the rents and profits for his personal benefit.

ANN JOHNSTON by her last will, amongst other things, devised as follows: "I give and bequeath unto my beloved nephew, Charles Earl Johnston, all my lands, as follows: One tract of land in Chowan County, lying on Indian Creek, called and known by the name of Boydsborough, containing 600 acres; the other tract lying on Chowan River, in the county aforesaid, containing 200 acres, and known by the name of the Rice Banks. Which said two tracts or parcels of land I give and bequeath unto him, the said Charles Earl Johnston, and his heirs forever, etc." And after several bequests of personal property, she further devised and directed as follows, viz.: "I hereby make and ordain my worthy and trusty friend, Jacob Blount, the whole and sole executor of this my last will and testament; and I do also hereby authorize and empower my before named executor to take upon himself the sole and whole management and disposal of the rents and profits of the several tracts of land, so as aforesaid devised, absolutely and exclusively, inasmuch as he may manage and dispose of the rents and profits of the said tracts of land, so as aforesaid devised, of whatever kind soever, without the restraint or constraint of any person or persons whatever, until my said nephew, Charles Earl (37) Johnston, shall arrive at the age of twenty-one years."


It was admitted that the said Charles E. Johnston, at the time of making the above will, lived with his father, Charles Johnston, Esq., who possessed a large independent fortune, and maintained and educated his son, the devisee, in a genteel and liberal manner.

The question was, whether Jacob Blount, the executor, or the devisee, was entitled to the profits of the lands devised during the minority of the devisee.


There is nothing upon the face of this will which warrants us to believe that it was the intent of the testator to give the profits to the executor for his private benefit. It seems to be a naked authority to manage and dispose of the profits, but to do so for the benefit of the devisee.


Summaries of

Blount v. Johnston

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Dec 1, 1804
5 N.C. 36 (N.C. 1804)
Case details for

Blount v. Johnston

Case Details

Full title:JACOB BLOUNT'S ADMINISTRATOR v. CHARLES JOHNSTON'S EXECUTOR

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Dec 1, 1804

Citations

5 N.C. 36 (N.C. 1804)

Citing Cases

Johnson v. Johnson

The intention of the testator as gathered from the four corners of his will controls the interpretation and…

Blount v. Johnston

(Fall Term, 1804.) NOTE. — See same case reported, 5 N.C. 36.…