From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bloomingdale's by Mail v. Com. D.O.R

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jun 4, 1991
591 A.2d 1047 (Pa. 1991)

Summary

In Bloomingdale's v. Dept. of Revenue (1991) 527 Pa. 347 [ 591 A.2d 1047] (Bloomingdale's), affirming 130 Pa. Commw. 190 [ 567 A.2d 773], certiorari denied ___ U.S. ___ [119 L.Ed.2d 223, 112 S.Ct. 2299], the court found that a sufficient nexus was not established between an out-of-state mail-order company, "Bloomingdale's By Mail," with no physical presence in the state and its parent company which owned retail stores within the taxing state.

Summary of this case from Current, Inc. v. State Bd. of Equalization

Opinion

May 7, 1991.

Decided June 4, 1991.

Appeal No. 3 M.D. Appeal Dkt. 1990 from Order of Commonwealth Court, 130 Pa. Commw. 190, 567 A.2d 773 (1989), entered December 18, 1989, at No. 2345 C.D. 1985.


ORDER


Order affirmed.

NIX, C.J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.

FLAHERTY and CAPPY, JJ., dissent and would dismiss the appeal as moot.


Summaries of

Bloomingdale's by Mail v. Com. D.O.R

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jun 4, 1991
591 A.2d 1047 (Pa. 1991)

In Bloomingdale's v. Dept. of Revenue (1991) 527 Pa. 347 [ 591 A.2d 1047] (Bloomingdale's), affirming 130 Pa. Commw. 190 [ 567 A.2d 773], certiorari denied ___ U.S. ___ [119 L.Ed.2d 223, 112 S.Ct. 2299], the court found that a sufficient nexus was not established between an out-of-state mail-order company, "Bloomingdale's By Mail," with no physical presence in the state and its parent company which owned retail stores within the taxing state.

Summary of this case from Current, Inc. v. State Bd. of Equalization
Case details for

Bloomingdale's by Mail v. Com. D.O.R

Case Details

Full title:BLOOMINGDALE'S BY MAIL LTD. v. COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, DEPARTMENT OF…

Court:Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Date published: Jun 4, 1991

Citations

591 A.2d 1047 (Pa. 1991)
591 A.2d 1047

Citing Cases

Current, Inc. v. State Bd. of Equalization

While this is a case of first impression in California, other states have considered similar factual…