From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Blick v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Aug 14, 2012
474 F. App'x 932 (4th Cir. 2012)

Opinion

No. 12-1431

08-14-2012

KATHLEEN BLICK; HAROLD BLICK, Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., a/k/a N.A. Wells Fargo Bank; DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, as "Trustee" for Soundview Home Loan Trust 2006-WF1 Asset Backed Certificates, Series 2006-WF1; EQUITY TRUSTEES, LLC, as "Substitute Trustee;" BIERMAN, GEESING, WARD & WOOD, LLC, as "Attorneys for Equity Trustees, LLC," Defendants - Appellees.

Kathleen Blick, Harold Blick, Appellants Pro Se. John Curtis Lynch, Ethan G. Ostroff, TROUTMAN SANDERS, LLP, Virginia Beach, Virginia; Syed Mohsin Reza, TROUTMAN SANDERS, LLP, McLean, Virginia; Robert Ryan Michael, BIERMAN GEESING WARD & WOOD, LLC, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Charlottesville. Norman K. Moon, Senior District Judge. (3:11-cv-00081-NKM-RSB) Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Kathleen Blick, Harold Blick, Appellants Pro Se. John Curtis Lynch, Ethan G. Ostroff, TROUTMAN SANDERS, LLP, Virginia Beach, Virginia; Syed Mohsin Reza, TROUTMAN SANDERS, LLP, McLean, Virginia; Robert Ryan Michael, BIERMAN GEESING WARD & WOOD, LLC, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Kathleen Blick and Harold Blick appeal the district court's order granting Defendants' Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) motions to dismiss their action to quiet title in real property. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellants' brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Blick v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., No. 3:11-cv-00081-NKM-RSB (W.D. Va. Mar. 27, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Blick v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Aug 14, 2012
474 F. App'x 932 (4th Cir. 2012)
Case details for

Blick v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Case Details

Full title:KATHLEEN BLICK; HAROLD BLICK, Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. WELLS FARGO…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Aug 14, 2012

Citations

474 F. App'x 932 (4th Cir. 2012)

Citing Cases

Wilson v. Wells Fargo Bank

Moreover, notice of a dispute given by a consumer directly to the furnisher is not sufficient to trigger the…

Webb v. EquiFirst Corp.

Judge Moon of this court quoted this same language in rejecting theories similar to those asserted here.…