From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Blanco v. United States

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Aug 17, 1950
184 F.2d 117 (9th Cir. 1950)

Opinion

No. 12508.

August 17, 1950.

L. Charles Gay, San Francisco, Cal., for appellant.

Frank J. Hennessy, U.S. Atty., Rudolph J. Scholz, Asst. U.S. Atty., San Francisco, Cal., for appellee.

Before MATHEWS, STEPHENS and ORR, Circuit Judges.


This appeal is from an order which granted a motion to dismiss an action, but did not dismiss it. Such an order is not a final decision, within the meaning of 28 U.S.C.A. § 1291, and is not appealable. Prickett v. Consolidated Liquidating Corp., 9 Cir., 180 F.2d 8; Turnbull v. Cyr, 9 Cir., 184 F.2d 117. See, also, City and County of San Francisco v. McLaughlin, 9 Cir., 9 F.2d 390; Wright v. Gibson, 9 Cir., 128 F.2d 865; Tee-Hit-Ton Tribe of Tlingit Indians etc., v. Olson, 9 Cir., 144 F.2d 347; Peoples Bank v. Federal Reserve Bank, 9 Cir., 149 F.2d 850; Cashion v. Bunn, 9 Cir., 149 F.2d 969. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed. Mandate to issue forthwith.


Summaries of

Blanco v. United States

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Aug 17, 1950
184 F.2d 117 (9th Cir. 1950)
Case details for

Blanco v. United States

Case Details

Full title:BLANCO v. UNITED STATES

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Aug 17, 1950

Citations

184 F.2d 117 (9th Cir. 1950)

Citing Cases

Williams v. Peters

This court has frequently held that an order dismissing a complaint, without dismissing the action, is not an…

United States v. State of Arizona

The United States Attorney had the same erroneous concept that such an order is appealable as the fourteen…