In Blakely, the Court clarified that the relevant maximum punishment was not the ultimate maximum for a give category of offense, but the maximum that which could be imposed based solely upon the facts found by the jury.
Summary of this case from Hess v. RyanNo. 02-1632.
August 23, 2004.
ante, p. 296. Motion of respondent to expedite consideration of petition for rehearing denied. Petition for rehearing denied.
In Blakely, the Court clarified that the relevant maximum punishment was not the ultimate maximum for a give category of offense, but the maximum that which could be imposed based solely upon the facts found by the jury.
Summary of this case from Hess v. RyanIn Blakely, the Court clarified that the relevant maximum punishment was not the ultimate maximum for a give category of offense, but the maximum that which could be imposed based solely upon the facts found by the jury.
Summary of this case from Hess v. Schriroinvalidating a Washington State criminal sentence because the facts supporting a sentence enhancement were neither admitted by the defendant nor found by a jury in violation of the Sixth Amendment right to a jury trial
Summary of this case from U.S. v. MellingerFull title:BLAKELY v. WASHINGTON
Court:U.S.
Date published: Aug 23, 2004
2. Trial counsel was constitutionally ineffective (ECF No. 1, at 12-13, 18-23 (incorporated in petitioner's…
U.S. v. WittigThe Court denied the government's request, and instead broke the items of compensation into the categories…