Summary
holding we lack jurisdiction over interlocutory appeal from denial of personal bond
Summary of this case from Sanderson v. StateOpinion
NO. 02-18-00188-CR
06-28-2018
QUINCY DEMOND BLAKELY APPELLANT v. THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE
FROM COUNTY CRIMINAL COURT NO. 1 OF DENTON COUNTY
TRIAL COURT NO. CR-2015-06355-E MEMORANDUM OPINION
See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
Appellant Quincy Demond Blakely attempts to appeal from the trial court's order denying his motion for pretrial release on a personal bond. We notified Blakely of our concern that we lack jurisdiction to consider the trial court's denial because it is not a final judgment of conviction, but he did not respond to our notice. See Tex. R. App. P. 44.3; Ragston v. State, 424 S.W.2d 49, 52 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014). As we stated in our notice to Blakely, we do not have jurisdiction to consider his appeal from the trial court's order. See Ragston, 424 S.W.3d at 52; Ex parte Briscoe, No. 02-15-00223-CR, 2015 WL 5893470, at *1 n.2 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth Oct. 8, 2015, no pet.). Therefore, we dismiss his appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(f).
/s/ Lee Gabriel
LEE GABRIEL
JUSTICE PANEL: GABRIEL, KERR, and PITTMAN, JJ. DO NOT PUBLISH
Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b) DELIVERED: June 28, 2018