From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Blake v. Smith

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Oct 1, 1913
79 S.E. 596 (N.C. 1913)

Opinion

(Filed 15 October, 1913.)

Interpretation of Statutes — Instructions — Appeal and Error.

The trial judge is ordinarily required to charge the jury to the extent of stating in a plain and correct manner the evidence given in the case, and to declare and explain the law arising thereon, except where the facts are few and simple and no principles of law are involved, and he is not requested to charge, Revisal, sec. 535; and in this case it is held for reversible error, there being much conflicting evidence, for the judge to instruct the jury to "take the case and settle it as between man and man," without charging on the different aspects of the case in accordance with the statute.

APPEAL by defendant from Carter, J., at April Term, 1913, of WAKE.

No counsel for plaintiff.

B. C. Beckwith for defendant.


Appeal from justice's court. Verdict and judgment for the plaintiff.

The defendant appealed.


This is a controversy over $14.88, the value of a hog.

The plaintiff and defendant introduced much evidence tending to prove the ownership and value of the hog. Defendant seems to have relied upon an estoppel. The case on appeal states that "His Honor did not charge the jury. He simply said: `Take the case, gentlemen, and settle it as between man and man.'" This constitutes one of (275) the defendant's assignments of error.

In this State the trial judge is required to charge the jury to the extent of stating in a plain and correct manner the evidence given in the case and declare and explain the law arising thereon (Revisal, sec. 535), except where the facts are few and simple and no principle of law is involved, and he is not requested to charge. Holly v. Holly, 94 N.C. 96.

The manner in which the judge is to state the law and evidence for the assistance of the jury must necessarily be left to a great extent to his sound discretion and good sense, but he must charge on the different aspects presented by the evidence, and give the law applicable thereto. S. v. Rippey, 104 N.C. 756; S. v. Matthews, 78 N.C. 537. For this error there must be a

New trial.


Summaries of

Blake v. Smith

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Oct 1, 1913
79 S.E. 596 (N.C. 1913)
Case details for

Blake v. Smith

Case Details

Full title:A. J. BLAKE v. THOMAS SMITH

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Oct 1, 1913

Citations

79 S.E. 596 (N.C. 1913)
163 N.C. 274

Citing Cases

Sears v. R. R

Exceptions in this case that the charge of the trial judge was inadequate, and not in compliance with Rev.,…

Yarn Co. v. Mauney

The manner in which the trial court shall state the evidence and declare and explain the law arising thereon…