From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Blair v. Du Mond

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 5, 1952
107 N.E.2d 91 (N.Y. 1952)

Opinion

Argued May 19, 1952

Decided June 5, 1952

Appeal from the Supreme Court, ELSWORTH, J.

Sherman S. Rogers and Paxton Blair for appellant.

Nathaniel L. Goldstein, Attorney-General ( Ruth Kessler Toch and Wendell P. Brown of counsel), for Commissioner of Agriculture and Markets of the State of New York, respondent.

Thomas P. Kennedy for Chairman of Board of Supervisors, Columbia County, respondent.


Appeal dismissed, with costs, upon the ground that there are questions involved other than the validity of a statutory provision under the State or Federal Constitutions (Civ. Prac. Act, § 588, subd. 4). No opinion.

Concur: LOUGHRAN, Ch. J., LEWIS, DESMOND, DYE, FULD and FROESSEL, JJ. Not sitting: CONWAY, J.


Summaries of

Blair v. Du Mond

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 5, 1952
107 N.E.2d 91 (N.Y. 1952)
Case details for

Blair v. Du Mond

Case Details

Full title:EDNA VON R. BLAIR, Appellant, v. C. CHESTER DU MOND, as Commissioner of…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jun 5, 1952

Citations

107 N.E.2d 91 (N.Y. 1952)
107 N.E.2d 91

Citing Cases

Schnapp v. Lefkowitz

(62 CJS, Municipal Corporations, § 218, pp 402-403 [dogs].) For illustrative cases, see Dog Owners Assn. of…

DOG OWNERS ASSN. v. Hilleboe

endants have cited numerous decisions which set forth that the rule concerning dogs is a special one.…