From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bittner v. Chanchalashvili

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 6, 1989
155 A.D.2d 403 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)

Opinion

November 6, 1989

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Hurowitz, J.).


Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted and the Clerk of the Supreme Court, Kings County, is directed to deliver to the Clerk of the Supreme Court, Queens County, all papers filed in the action and certified copies of all minutes and entries (CPLR 511 [d]).

The record clearly indicates that the cause of action accrued in Queens County, and that both the plaintiff and the defendant were at all relevant times residents of Queens County. The defendant served a demand for a change of venue along with her answer, and thereafter timely moved for a change of venue (CPLR 511 [a], [b]). The plaintiff failed to either crossmove or otherwise establish any reason why the venue of the action should be retained in Kings County (see, Pitegoff v Lucia, 97 A.D.2d 896). Accordingly, the court erred in denying the defendant's motion. Thompson, J.P., Bracken, Brown, Sullivan and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Bittner v. Chanchalashvili

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 6, 1989
155 A.D.2d 403 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)
Case details for

Bittner v. Chanchalashvili

Case Details

Full title:JUNE BITTNER, Respondent, v. I.V. CHANCHALASHVILI, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 6, 1989

Citations

155 A.D.2d 403 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)
547 N.Y.S.2d 79