From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bishop v. Kelly

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Oct 21, 1981
404 So. 2d 1149 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)

Opinion

No. 81-138.

October 21, 1981.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Hernando County, Wallace Sturgis, J.

James W. O'Neill, Jr., Law Offices of William F. Casler, Sr., St. Petersburg, for appellants.

Joseph E. Johnston, Jr., and Julius F. Parker, Jr., of Madigan, Parker, Gatlin, Swedmark Skelding, Tallahassee, for appellees.


An order dismissing a complaint with leave to amend is a non-final order. As such, it is not appealable prior to final dismissal. Hancock v. Piper, 186 So.2d 489 (Fla. 1966); Petnuch v. Smith, 395 So.2d 294 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981). Accordingly, this appeal is sua sponte

DISMISSED.

DAUKSCH, C.J., and COBB and SHARP, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Bishop v. Kelly

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Oct 21, 1981
404 So. 2d 1149 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)
Case details for

Bishop v. Kelly

Case Details

Full title:BERNARD BISHOP, DAN WORSHAM AND RONALD FORBELL, APPELLANTS, v. MELVIN…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Oct 21, 1981

Citations

404 So. 2d 1149 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)

Citing Cases

Reynolds Ventures v. Sargent

We dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the interlocutory order of dismissal below is a…

Potts v. Potts

We observe initially that, while appellant probably did not state a cause of action, the court dismissed the…