From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bird v. Post

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 1, 1908
124 App. Div. 902 (N.Y. App. Div. 1908)

Opinion

January, 1908.


Interlocutory judgment affirmed on the opinion of Mr. Justice Kelly at Special Term, with costs. Jenks, Hooker, Gaynor, Rich and Miller, JJ., concurred.

The following is the opinion delivered at Special Term:


Whatever may be my own views as to the sufficiency of the complaint, the demurrers must be sustained on the authority of Green v. Davies ( 182 N.Y. 499). Under that decision the alleged conspiracy creates no cause of action and the overt acts pleaded as the result of the conspiracy constitute separate torts which cannot be united in one complaint. Demurrers sustained, with costs.


Summaries of

Bird v. Post

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 1, 1908
124 App. Div. 902 (N.Y. App. Div. 1908)
Case details for

Bird v. Post

Case Details

Full title:HOBART S. BIRD, Appellant, v . REGIS H. POST and Others, Respondents…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 1, 1908

Citations

124 App. Div. 902 (N.Y. App. Div. 1908)

Citing Cases

Rodgers v. Kerbaugh, Incorporated

"Where the conspiracy results in the commission of that which would be an actionable tort, whether committed…

Frost v. Grizzly Bluff Creamery Co.

The alleged errors of the court in giving and refusing instructions cannot be reviewed, because they were not…