From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Binks Mfg. Co. v. Ransburg Corp.

U.S.
May 8, 1961
366 U.S. 211 (1961)

Opinion

CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT.

No. 501.

Argued May 3-4, 1961. Decided May 8, 1961.

Certiorari dismissed as not warranted on record.

Reported below: 281 F.2d 252.

W. Donald McSweeney and Charles F. Meroni argued the cause for petitioner. With them on the briefs were Otto R. Krause and John B. Robinson, Jr.

Elbert R. Gilliom argued the cause for respondent. With him on the briefs were James P. Hume and Harry T. Ice.

Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Loevinger and Richard A. Solomon filed a brief for the United States, as amicus curiae.


After hearing oral argument and fully examining the record, we conclude that the totality of circumstances as the record makes them manifest did not warrant bringing the case here. Accordingly, the writ is dismissed.


Summaries of

Binks Mfg. Co. v. Ransburg Corp.

U.S.
May 8, 1961
366 U.S. 211 (1961)
Case details for

Binks Mfg. Co. v. Ransburg Corp.

Case Details

Full title:BINKS MANUFACTURING CO. v . RANSBURG ELECTRO-COATING CORP

Court:U.S.

Date published: May 8, 1961

Citations

366 U.S. 211 (1961)
81 S. Ct. 1091

Citing Cases

Eversharp, Inc. v. Fisher Pen Co.

21. Immediate and resounding commercial success which is continued from the time of introduction of the…

W.R. Grace Co. v. Park Manufacturing Company

Reese v. Elkhart Welding Boiler Works, Inc., 447 F.2d 517, 527 (7th Cir. 1971) and University of Illinois…