From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Billboard Sportswear, Inc. v. Kapadia

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 11, 1997
237 A.D.2d 135 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

March 11, 1997.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Carol Arber, J.), entered March 8, 1996, which granted defendants' motion for renewal of a prior motion by plaintiff for summary judgment but adhered to the prior determination granting Plaintiff's motion as to the issue of defendants' liability, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Before: Murphy, P.J., Williams, Tom and Mazzarelli, JJ.


Defendants have never refuted documentary evidence that they agreed to pay for the subject goods and actually made payments for them. Defendants raise only immaterial issues and improperly attempt to avoid summary judgment in the hope that a question of fact will be raised in cross-examining Plaintiff's witness ( see, Badman v Civil Serv. Empls. Assn., 91 AD2d 858). We have considered defendants' remaining arguments and find them to be without merit.


Summaries of

Billboard Sportswear, Inc. v. Kapadia

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 11, 1997
237 A.D.2d 135 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

Billboard Sportswear, Inc. v. Kapadia

Case Details

Full title:BILLBOARD SPORTSWEAR, INC., Respondent, v. JAMNADAS K. KAPADIA et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Mar 11, 1997

Citations

237 A.D.2d 135 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
655 N.Y.S.2d 354

Citing Cases

Angeles v. Goldhirsch [1st Dept 2000

Plaintiffs demonstrated that defendants violated their non-delegable duty, pursuant to Labor Law § 240…

Angeles v. Goldhirsch

Plaintiffs demonstrated that defendants violated their non-delegable duty, pursuant to Labor Law § 240…