From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bilger v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
May 14, 1971
247 So. 2d 721 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1971)

Opinion

No. 70-912.

May 14, 1971.

Appeal from Court of Record, Sarasota County; Marvin Silverman, Judge.

Law Offices of Alex D. Finch, Clearwater, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Warren H. Petersen, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lakeland, for appellee.


The trial judge did not follow Boykin v. Alabama, 1969, 395 U.S. 238, 89 S.Ct. 1709, 23 L.Ed.2d 274, and the guilty plea received cannot stand without a record supporting its voluntariness. Appellant's contention that she was promised probation if she would waive extradition from Ohio and plead guilty is disputed by the State, which claims that no promises were made. It is clear, however, that the State's agents discussed probation with appellant's Ohio counsel, were advised that she would be accepted as a probationer there and there is here at least the degree of misunderstanding present in Brown v. State, Fla. 1971, 245 So.2d 41.

Reversed and remanded with directions to vacate the guilty plea.

PIERCE, C.J., and LILES, J., concur.


Summaries of

Bilger v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
May 14, 1971
247 So. 2d 721 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1971)
Case details for

Bilger v. State

Case Details

Full title:BARBARA ANN BILGER A/K/A BARBARA A. NEWTON, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: May 14, 1971

Citations

247 So. 2d 721 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1971)

Citing Cases

United States v. Taylor

ted States, 220 U.S. 523, 31 S. Ct. 485, 55 L. Ed. 570; North Bloomfield Gravel Mining Co. v. United States…

Taylor v. Balderston

The general rule is that a state, like any individual owner of property, may acquire and convey its property…