From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

BICKHAM v. SUB SEA INTERN., INC

Supreme Court of Louisiana
May 21, 1993
617 So. 2d 483 (La. 1993)

Summary

holding that the defendant's filing of interrogatories and requests for production of documents after filing an exception of improper venue did not waive the pending venue exception

Summary of this case from Commercial Union Insurance Co. v. CBC Temporary Staffing Services, Inc.

Opinion

No. 93-CC-0541.

April 30, 1993. Rehearing Denied May 21, 1993.

APPEAL FROM CIVIL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF ORLEANS, STATE OF LOUISIANA, HONORABLE RICHARD J. GARVEY, J.


The court of appeal 614 So.2d 115 correctly held that defendant did not waive its exception of improper venue while it filed the declinatory exception in the same pleading with the answer.

However, the court of appeal erred in holding that defendant's filing interrogatories and requests for production of documents, after filing the exception of improper venue but before the trial on the exception, waived its pending exception. While defendant's actions constituted a general appearance which would have waived any objections raised by declinatory exceptions if the actions had occurred before the venue exceptions was filed, the general appearance did not waive the pending exception. There is a useful purpose (judicial efficiency) in the requirement that all declinatory and dilatory exceptions be filed prior to answer or general appearance, but there is no useful purpose in judicially extending this requirement to constitute a waiver when the general appearance is made after the declinatory exception has been filed. Our conclusion that the subsequent general appearance, before trial of the exception, does not constitute a waiver of the pending exception is consistent with the intermediate court's conclusion (with which we agree) that the subsequent (or simultaneous) filing of an answer, before trial of the exception, does not waive the pending exception.

Accordingly, the judgment of the court of appeal is set aside, and the judgment of the district court maintaining the exception of improper venue is reinstated. The case is remanded to the court of appeal to consider plaintiff's alternative argument to support venue in Orleans Parish.


Summaries of

BICKHAM v. SUB SEA INTERN., INC

Supreme Court of Louisiana
May 21, 1993
617 So. 2d 483 (La. 1993)

holding that the defendant's filing of interrogatories and requests for production of documents after filing an exception of improper venue did not waive the pending venue exception

Summary of this case from Commercial Union Insurance Co. v. CBC Temporary Staffing Services, Inc.

In Bickham v. Sub Sea International, Inc., 617 So.2d 483 (La. 1993), the Louisiana Supreme Court found that the defendant did not waive the pending declinatory exception of improper venue by filing interrogatories and requests for production of documents, together with its answer, while the exception was pending.

Summary of this case from Durio v. Robert E. Lee

In Bickham v. Sub Sea International, Inc., 617 So.2d 483 (La. 1993), the Louisiana Supreme Court held that the defendant did not waive the pending declinatory exception of improper venue by filing interrogatories and requests for production of documents while the exception was pending.

Summary of this case from Triche v. Crescent Turnkey

In Bickham the Supreme Court held that the subsequent filing of interrogatories and requests for production of documents did not waive a previously filed exception of improper venue.

Summary of this case from Landry v. Gibbens

In Bickham, the court concluded that defendant's filing of interrogatories and requests for production of documents, after the filing of the exception of improper venue but before trial on the exception, did not constitute a waiver of the exception.

Summary of this case from Delay v. Charbonnet
Case details for

BICKHAM v. SUB SEA INTERN., INC

Case Details

Full title:WALTER BICKHAM v. SUB SEA INTERNATIONAL, INC., ET AL

Court:Supreme Court of Louisiana

Date published: May 21, 1993

Citations

617 So. 2d 483 (La. 1993)

Citing Cases

Triche v. Crescent Turnkey

LSA-C.C.P. art. 928 sets forth the time periods for the pleading of exceptions and provides, in pertinent…

Slaughter v. ARCO Chemical Co.

Such actions by a defendant who has moved for dismissal should not be characterized as expressing an…