From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bickel v. Ford Motor Company

Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Sep 20, 1963
370 S.W.2d 193 (Ky. Ct. App. 1963)

Opinion

June 28, 1963. Rehearing Denied September 20, 1963.

Appeal from the Jefferson Circuit Court, Common Pleas Branch, First Division, Alex P. Humphrey, J.

Chester L. Rigsby, Louisville, for appellant.

James M. Graves, William P. Swain, Boehl, Stopher, Graves Deindoerfer, Louisville, for appellees.


The Ford Motor Company maintains a parking lot adjacent to its operational premises for the use and benefit of its employees. Bickel, a Ford employee arriving for work, parked on the lot. He started on foot to the plant. While still on the parking lot he fell on ice and was injured.

He filed his claim for Workmen's Compensation under KRS, Chapter 342. The case was heard by the Workmen's Compensation Board and the claim was denied. The Board held that the injury did not arise out of Bickel's employment as provided in KRS 342.005. Bickel sought a review in the circuit court. The Board's action was there affirmed and Bickel appeals to this Court.

On appeal there is only one question. Did the injury arise out of Bickel's employment as required by KRS 342.005? Bickel's employment was within the plant.

Authorities of equal dignity have been cited tending to support the positions of the employer and employee. After consideration of the facts we have concluded to follow the principle enunciated in United States Steel Co. v. Isbell, Ky., 275 S.W.2d 917. This Court is taking the position that Bickel's injury did not arise out of his employment within the meaning of KRS 342.005. The accident and resulting injury were not incident to the hazards of Bickel's employment.

We find no error and the judgment is affirmed.

MILLIKEN, J., dissenting.


Summaries of

Bickel v. Ford Motor Company

Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Sep 20, 1963
370 S.W.2d 193 (Ky. Ct. App. 1963)
Case details for

Bickel v. Ford Motor Company

Case Details

Full title:Robert H. BICKEL, Appellant, v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY et al., Appellees

Court:Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Date published: Sep 20, 1963

Citations

370 S.W.2d 193 (Ky. Ct. App. 1963)

Citing Cases

Ratliff v. Epling

On the other hand, we have not adopted the converse rule (which generally prevails) that the employee is…

Harlan Appalachian Regional Hospital v. Taylor

It is urged by appellants that an injury sustained by the employee while on the way to work, but before…