From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bichon v. Wiley

United States District Court, D. Colorado
Nov 13, 2006
Civil Action No. 06-cv-00111-EWN-MEH (D. Colo. Nov. 13, 2006)

Summary

In Bichon, Magistrate Judge Hegarty concluded that 28 C.F.R. § 570.21 was a reasonable and permissible construction of the BOP's discretionary authority under 18 U.S.C. § 3621(b).

Summary of this case from Rosenstein v. Wiley

Opinion

Civil Action No. 06-cv-00111-EWN-MEH.

November 13, 2006


ORDER ACCEPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S RECOMMENDATION


This matter is before the court on the "Recommendation for Dismissal" filed October 16, 2006. No party has objected to the recommendation. I have conducted the requisite de novo review of the issues, the record, and the recommendation. Based on this review, I have concluded that the recommendation is a correct application of the facts and the law. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED as follows:

1. The recommendation is ACCEPTED.
2. The amended application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (#4) filed February 6, 2006 is DENIED.
3. This case is dismissed with prejudice in its entirety.


Summaries of

Bichon v. Wiley

United States District Court, D. Colorado
Nov 13, 2006
Civil Action No. 06-cv-00111-EWN-MEH (D. Colo. Nov. 13, 2006)

In Bichon, Magistrate Judge Hegarty concluded that 28 C.F.R. § 570.21 was a reasonable and permissible construction of the BOP's discretionary authority under 18 U.S.C. § 3621(b).

Summary of this case from Rosenstein v. Wiley

In Bichon, Magistrate Judge Hegarty concluded that 28 C.F.R. § 570.21 was a reasonable and permissible construction of the BOP's discretionary authority under 18 U.S.C. § 3621(b).

Summary of this case from Bell v. Wiley
Case details for

Bichon v. Wiley

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT E. BICHON, Plaintiff, v. R. WILEY, Warden, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, D. Colorado

Date published: Nov 13, 2006

Citations

Civil Action No. 06-cv-00111-EWN-MEH (D. Colo. Nov. 13, 2006)

Citing Cases

Wedelstedt v. Wiley

Id. at *4. This court's opinion will resolve several conflicting decisions of the Colorado district court.…

Rosenstein v. Wiley

See Levine v. Apker, 455 F.3d 71 (2d Cir. 2006); Fults v. Sanders, 442 F.3d 1088 (8th Cir. 2006); Woodall v.…