From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bichan v. Chemetron Corp.

U.S.
Feb 28, 1983
460 U.S. 1016 (1983)

Summary

holding that a former corporate president who had been terminated from employment and blacklisted by the industry did not suffer an antitrust injury so as to give him standing

Summary of this case from Hughes v. Halbach Braun Industries, Ltd.

Opinion

No. 82-493.

February 28, 1983, OCTOBER TERM, 1982.


C.A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied. JUSTICE BLACKMUN would grant certiorari, vacate the judgment, and remand the case for further consideration in light of Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. Carpenters, 459 U. S. 519 (1983). Reported below: 681 F. 2d 514.


Summaries of

Bichan v. Chemetron Corp.

U.S.
Feb 28, 1983
460 U.S. 1016 (1983)

holding that a former corporate president who had been terminated from employment and blacklisted by the industry did not suffer an antitrust injury so as to give him standing

Summary of this case from Hughes v. Halbach Braun Industries, Ltd.

noting "§ 113(c) requires proof of intent to do bodily harm, whereas § 133(d) requires no specific intent of any kind"

Summary of this case from United States v. Fitzgerald

dismissing an employee's antitrust action for lack of standing, in part, because ". . . his injury [was] simply too remote from the alleged illegal conduct." Id. at 519

Summary of this case from O'Donnell v. Kusper
Case details for

Bichan v. Chemetron Corp.

Case Details

Full title:BICHAN v. CHEMETRON CORP. et al

Court:U.S.

Date published: Feb 28, 1983

Citations

460 U.S. 1016 (1983)

Citing Cases

Haigh v. Matsushita Elec. Corp. of Am.

In 1982, two Circuits, the Seventh and the Ninth, had occasion to consider the claims of employees who…

Stephens v. Kemp

We need not engage in a detailed inquiry into whether the charge quoted above reveals a Sandstrom violation,…