From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

BEY v. I.B.E.W. LOCAL UNION #3

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Mar 25, 2008
05 Civ. 7910 (JSR) (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 25, 2008)

Summary

explaining that an alleged failure to investigate is a discrete act

Summary of this case from Rogers v. Fashion Inst. of Tech.

Opinion

05 Civ. 7910 (JSR).

March 25, 2008


ORDER


On January 30, 2008, the Honorable Michael H. Dolinger, United States Magistrate Judge, issued a very thorough and well-reasoned Report and Recommendation in the above-captioned matter recommending 1) the dismissal of plaintiff's claims against defendants Christopher Erikson, Jim Robson, and Michael Yee; 2) the grant of summary judgment in favor of defendant I.B.E.W. Local Union #3 ("Local 3") on all of plaintiff's claims except his Title VII retaliation claim based on his lawsuit against his former employer Welsbach Electric Corporation; 3) the denial of plaintiff's apparent summary judgment motion; and 4) the denial of plaintiff's request for further time to depose defendants.

Subsequently, by letter dated February 10, 2008, plaintiff requested an additional 35 days to submit his objections to Judge Dolinger's Report. The Court granted that request, see Order, 2/14/08, and plaintiff duly submitted such objections. Defendant Local 3 submitted objections to certain portions of the Report and Recommendation on February 23, 2008. Accordingly, the Court has reviewed the motion and the underlying record de novo.

The objections of Local 3 were untimely and, unlike the pro se plaintiff, Local 3 failed to move for an extension of its time to object. Nevertheless, the Court has considered Local 3's objections, as they were submitted well within the additional time the Court had already granted to plaintiff for his objections.

Having done so, the Court finds itself in complete agreement with Magistrate Judge Dolinger's Report and Recommendation and hereby adopts its reasoning by reference. Accordingly, the Court 1) dismisses plaintiff's claims against Erikson, Robson, and Yee; 2) grants summary judgment to Local 3 on all claims except for plaintiff's Title VII retaliation claim based on his lawsuit against Welsbach Electric Corporation; 3) denies plaintiff's summary judgment motion; and 4) denies plaintiff's request for additional time to depose defendants. The Magistrate Judge is directed to take any remaining steps necessary to make the remaining claim trial ready, including preparation of the Pre-Trial Consent Order.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

BEY v. I.B.E.W. LOCAL UNION #3

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Mar 25, 2008
05 Civ. 7910 (JSR) (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 25, 2008)

explaining that an alleged failure to investigate is a discrete act

Summary of this case from Rogers v. Fashion Inst. of Tech.
Case details for

BEY v. I.B.E.W. LOCAL UNION #3

Case Details

Full title:MESSIAH A. BEY, Plaintiff, v. I.B.E.W. LOCAL UNION #3; UNION…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Mar 25, 2008

Citations

05 Civ. 7910 (JSR) (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 25, 2008)

Citing Cases

Rogers v. Fashion Inst. of Tech.

Indeed, courts have routinely found acts of the variety that Plaintiff alleges occurred prior to June 15,…

Kazolias v. IBEW LU 363

In this Circuit, courts have held that the statute of limitations for all duty of fair representation claims…