From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bettis v. State

Supreme Court of Florida
Jun 15, 2006
Case No. SC06-59 (Fla. Jun. 15, 2006)

Opinion

Case No. SC06-59.

June 15, 2006.


Petitioner has submitted an all writs petition, which this Court has treated as a petition for writ of mandamus. As petitioner has failed to demonstrate a clear legal right to the relief requested, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied.See Huffman v. State, 813 So. 2d 10, 11 (Fla. 2000) (holding that in order to be entitled to a writ of mandamus, the petitioner must show that he has a clear legal right to performance of the requested act, that the respondent has an indisputable legal duty to perform that act, and that no other adequate remedy exists).

WELLS, ANSTEAD, QUINCE, CANTERO and BELL, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Bettis v. State

Supreme Court of Florida
Jun 15, 2006
Case No. SC06-59 (Fla. Jun. 15, 2006)
Case details for

Bettis v. State

Case Details

Full title:SAMUEL BETTIS, Petitioner(s) v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent(s)

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Jun 15, 2006

Citations

Case No. SC06-59 (Fla. Jun. 15, 2006)