Opinion
May 11, 1995
Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Alfred Toker, J.).
The IAS Court, in this personal injury action, properly denied the motion for summary judgment seeking to dismiss the plaintiff's complaint. The record reveals that NYCTA and the Manhattan and Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority ("MABSTOA") should be equitably estopped from denying lack of proper notice, where, as here, their conduct was calculated to, or negligently did, mislead or discourage the plaintiff from serving a timely notice of claim (Fryczynski v Niagara Frontier Transp. Auth., 116 A.D.2d 979, lv dismissed 67 N.Y.2d 960).
Summary judgment should also be denied because there is a material triable issue of fact, raised by NYCTA's maintenance records, as to whether defendant NYCTA, rather than MABSTOA, maintained and/or repaired the defective passenger seat on the bus that precipitated the plaintiff's injuries.
Concur — Murphy, P.J., Rubin, Williams and Tom, JJ.