From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bethel v. Middletown City School District

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division
Apr 21, 2011
Case No. 1:11-cv-206 (S.D. Ohio Apr. 21, 2011)

Summary

dismissing without prejudice claims brought by parents on behalf of minor children

Summary of this case from Mathis v. Ohio Dep't of Job & Family Servs.

Opinion

Case No. 1:11-cv-206.

April 21, 2011


ORDER


Pursuant to the Judicial Conference Policy on Privacy and the E-Government Act of 2002, Pub.L. No. 107-347, filing parties shall omit or partially redact personal data identifiers from all pleadings, documents and exhibits. Plaintiffs are notified that any further documents filed with the Court shall omit personal identifiers such as the names of minor children.

The Clerk of Court is hereby DIRECTED to redact the privacy information from the documents submitted by plaintiffs for filing with this Court.

The Clerk of Court is further DIRECTED to electronically file the redacted versions of plaintiffs' complaint and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. The Clerk is DIRECTED to seal the original complaint and motion and to reflect the sealing of these documents on the docket of the Court. The original complaint and in forma pauperis motion shall be retained under seal until further order of the Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Date: 4/20/2011


Summaries of

Bethel v. Middletown City School District

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division
Apr 21, 2011
Case No. 1:11-cv-206 (S.D. Ohio Apr. 21, 2011)

dismissing without prejudice claims brought by parents on behalf of minor children

Summary of this case from Mathis v. Ohio Dep't of Job & Family Servs.
Case details for

Bethel v. Middletown City School District

Case Details

Full title:ORLANDO BETHEL, et al., Plaintiffs v. THE MIDDLETOWN CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division

Date published: Apr 21, 2011

Citations

Case No. 1:11-cv-206 (S.D. Ohio Apr. 21, 2011)

Citing Cases

Mathis v. Ohio Dep't of Job & Family Servs.

It is therefore appropriate to dismiss the minor children's claims without prejudice. Id. See also Bender v.…

Collier v. Whithall Police Dep't

ors cannot then bring the claim themselves”). “The rule against non-lawyer representation protects the rights…