From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Beth Equities v. Silgo Greenwich Associates

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 9, 1996
223 A.D.2d 367 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Summary

In Beth Equities, the seller made clear from the beginning that closing had to occur by a date certain because of a related Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation sale. The contract gave some flexibility as to the law date — which would be selected at the seller's option — but did specify the outer time limits.

Summary of this case from Miller v. Almquist

Opinion

January 9, 1996

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Ira Gammerman, J.).


Based on the documentary evidence submitted to the motion court, it is clear that plaintiff was not prevented from closing on the scheduled "time of the essence" date due to renovations in the building by the ground floor tenant or reluctance of the lender, such conditions not being made part of the contract. Nor did the contract have any financing contingency clause which might have excused plaintiff's failure to perform. We also find that the defendant conclusively established, by documentary evidence, that a "time of the essence" closing had been set for May 26, 1995 ( see, Liba Estates v Edryn Corp., 178 A.D.2d 152, 153).

Concur — Murphy, P.J., Wallach, Kupferman, Ross and Williams, JJ.


Summaries of

Beth Equities v. Silgo Greenwich Associates

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 9, 1996
223 A.D.2d 367 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

In Beth Equities, the seller made clear from the beginning that closing had to occur by a date certain because of a related Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation sale. The contract gave some flexibility as to the law date — which would be selected at the seller's option — but did specify the outer time limits.

Summary of this case from Miller v. Almquist
Case details for

Beth Equities v. Silgo Greenwich Associates

Case Details

Full title:BETH EQUITIES, Appellant, v. SILGO GREENWICH ASSOCIATES et al., Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jan 9, 1996

Citations

223 A.D.2d 367 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
636 N.Y.S.2d 309

Citing Cases

REEC W. 11th St. LLC v. 246 W. 11th St. Realty Corp.

Plaintiff failed to close. On February 14, 2017, defendant issued the time of essence letter with a closing…

Ner Tamid Congregation v. Krivoruchko

As in the instant case, there was no mortgage contingency clause. See also Beth Equities v. Silgo Greenwich…