From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bershadsky v. Harvilla

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 28, 1951
279 App. Div. 701 (N.Y. App. Div. 1951)

Opinion

November 28, 1951.

Appeal from Supreme Court, Broome County.

Present — Foster, P.J., Heffernan, Brewster, Bergan and Coon, JJ.


On August 20, 1950, an automobile collision involving the parties in the five actions here occurred in Sullivan County. As a result of that collision five separate actions were instituted. Action No. 3 was commenced on September 27, 1950, and the venue laid in Broome County. Action No. 1 was commenced on November 16, 1950, and the venue laid in Kings County. Action No. 2 was commenced on November 25, 1950, and the venue laid in Kings County. Action No. 4 was commenced on February 2, 1951, and the venue laid in Kings County. Action No. 5 was commenced on December 7, 1950, and the venue laid in Kings County. The defendants in action No. 3 made a motion in Broome County to consolidate the actions. Upon the return date of the motion the only persons appearing in opposition were the plaintiffs in actions Nos. 1 and 2. Defendants' attorney in action No. 3 submitted an affidavit in support of the motion. It is conceded that the action in Broome County was first instituted. After hearing the parties the Special Term made an order of consolidation and from that order the plaintiffs in actions Nos. 1 and 2 have appealed. The provision of the Civil Practice Act permitting consolidation should be liberally construed so as to permit consolidation whenever possible without injustice to any of the parties. We think the Special Term made a proper disposition of the motion and that we should not interfere with the exercise of its discretion. Order appealed from unanimously affirmed, with $10 costs and printing disbursements to the respondent in action No. 3 against the plaintiffs in actions Nos. 1 and 2.


Summaries of

Bershadsky v. Harvilla

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 28, 1951
279 App. Div. 701 (N.Y. App. Div. 1951)
Case details for

Bershadsky v. Harvilla

Case Details

Full title:ABRAHAM BERSHADSKY, Appellant, v. MICHAEL HARVILLA, Respondent. (Action…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Nov 28, 1951

Citations

279 App. Div. 701 (N.Y. App. Div. 1951)

Citing Cases

Simplex Plumbing Supply Co. v. Bonded Heat Power

In the instant case, however, no lengthy delay would result from consolidation; hence, no real prejudice…

Lepke v. Sclafani Sons

(Civ. Prac. Act, § 96.) The purpose of consolidation is to eliminate technicalities, multiplicities of…