From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bernat v. Echo Society of Niagara Falls

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jan 21, 1960
165 N.E.2d 428 (N.Y. 1960)

Opinion

Argued January 6, 1960

Decided January 21, 1960

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Fourth Judicial Department, MATTHEW J. JASEN, J.

Ira M.J. Hovey and Abraham R. Kushner for appellants.

Sigismund M. Lopacki for respondent.


Judgment reversed and new trial granted, with costs to abide the event. The court erred in dismissing the complaint at the close of plaintiffs' case since questions of fact were presented (1) as to whether plaintiffs had adverse possession of the land in dispute under a claim of title, and (2) as to whether they were entitled to "tack" their possession onto that of their predecessors in order to establish an adverse holding for the requisite statutory period. (Civ. Prac. Act, § 40; see, also, Belotti v. Bickhardt, 228 N.Y. 296, 302, 306; Barnes v. Light, 116 N.Y. 34, 37, 39.) No opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge DESMOND and Judges DYE, FULD, FROESSEL, VAN VOORHIS, BURKE and FOSTER.


Summaries of

Bernat v. Echo Society of Niagara Falls

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jan 21, 1960
165 N.E.2d 428 (N.Y. 1960)
Case details for

Bernat v. Echo Society of Niagara Falls

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM J. BERNAT et al., Appellants, v. ECHO SOCIETY OF NIAGARA FALLS…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jan 21, 1960

Citations

165 N.E.2d 428 (N.Y. 1960)
165 N.E.2d 428
197 N.Y.S.2d 480

Citing Cases

Walling v. Przybylo

In the absence of an overt acknowledgment, our courts have recognized since Humbert v. Trinity Church (…

Jacobs v. Lewicki

So long as there is privity between that claimant and his predecessors in a continuous chain, the right may…