From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bernardo v. Barrett

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Nov 11, 1982
57 N.Y.2d 1006 (N.Y. 1982)

Summary

affirming lower court's dismissal where plaintiffs failed to prove adequate service by providing evidence that defendant's contentions as to her actual residence were false

Summary of this case from Tokio Marine Nichido Fire Insurance Co. v. Canter

Opinion

Decided November 11, 1982

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, FRANK P. DE LUCA, J.

Lawrence Rothberg and Bernard Meyerson for appellants.

Thomas A. Osborn for respondent.



On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 N.Y.CRR 500.2 [g]), order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division ( 87 A.D.2d 832).

Concur: Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and MEYER.


Summaries of

Bernardo v. Barrett

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Nov 11, 1982
57 N.Y.2d 1006 (N.Y. 1982)

affirming lower court's dismissal where plaintiffs failed to prove adequate service by providing evidence that defendant's contentions as to her actual residence were false

Summary of this case from Tokio Marine Nichido Fire Insurance Co. v. Canter
Case details for

Bernardo v. Barrett

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL BERNARDO, an Infant, by His Father and Natural Guardian, CLEMENT…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Nov 11, 1982

Citations

57 N.Y.2d 1006 (N.Y. 1982)
457 N.Y.S.2d 479
443 N.E.2d 953

Citing Cases

Tokio Marine Nichido Fire Insurance Co. v. Canter

As plaintiffs have failed to carry their burden of proving that service was properly made under N.Y.…

SYZ Holdings, LLC v. Brecht Forum, Inc.

"The burden of proving in personam jurisdiction is on the party asserting it" ( Bernardo v Barrett, 87 AD2d…