From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bernard Screen Print v. Univ. Term. Stevedoring Corp.

U.S.
Jan 22, 1973
410 U.S. 910 (1973)

Summary

pointing out that federal courts do not intervene in state election contests for the purpose of deciding issues of state law, if no federal constitutional question is involved

Summary of this case from Curtis v. Smith

Opinion

No. 72-756.

January 22, 1973.


C.A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 464 F. 2d 934.


Summaries of

Bernard Screen Print v. Univ. Term. Stevedoring Corp.

U.S.
Jan 22, 1973
410 U.S. 910 (1973)

pointing out that federal courts do not intervene in state election contests for the purpose of deciding issues of state law, if no federal constitutional question is involved

Summary of this case from Curtis v. Smith
Case details for

Bernard Screen Print v. Univ. Term. Stevedoring Corp.

Case Details

Full title:BERNARD SCREEN PRINTING CORP. v. UNIVERSAL TERMINAL STEVEDORING CORP

Court:U.S.

Date published: Jan 22, 1973

Citations

410 U.S. 910 (1973)

Citing Cases

Tessler Brothers

We and other courts interpret this to mean that under certain circumstances parties to a contract of carriage…

Welch v. McKenzie

Invalidation of the election did not, however, so exhaust the remedial range of the complaint as to fully end…