holding an "affiliates" clause much like the Coal Lands clause legal under rule of reason analysis
Summary of this case from Lone Star Steel v. United Mine W. of Am.No. 81-279.
November 2, 1981.
C.A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 644 F. 2d 930.
holding an "affiliates" clause much like the Coal Lands clause legal under rule of reason analysis
Summary of this case from Lone Star Steel v. United Mine W. of Am.finding no liability pursuant to an implied covenant where the terms of the indenture, as bargained for, were enforced
Summary of this case from Metropolitan Life Insurance v. RJR Nabisco, Inc.applying New York law
Summary of this case from Paragon Resources v. Nat Fuel Gas Distributionapplying New York law to a claim regarding an implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing
Summary of this case from Frutico S.A. de C.V. v. Bankers Trustinterpreting an indenture under New York law
Summary of this case from U.S. Trust Co. of N.Y. v. Executive Life Ins. Co.Full title:BERMAN ENTERPRISES, INC., ET AL. v. LOCAL 333, UNITED MARINE DIVISION…
Court:U.S.
Date published: Nov 2, 1981
Green v. Hamilton Intern. Corp., 437 F. Supp. 723, 727 (S.D.N.Y. 1977); Camp v. Genesco, [1976-77]…
Hartford Fire Ins. v. Fed. Dept. StoresThis implied covenant means that "`neither party shall do anything which will have the effect of destroying…