From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Berlin v. Nassau County Council

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 8, 1996
229 A.D.2d 414 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

July 8, 1996

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (McCarty, J.).


Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, the complaint and cross claims insofar as asserted against the appellant are dismissed, and the action against the remaining defendants is severed.

Brian Thomson acquired a slingshot from a store in Florida while on a trip with his Boy Scout troop. The appellant Hugh Brickley and the defendants Kenneth Bistyga and Philip Lembo were the chaperones for the trip. Brickley immediately confiscated the slingshot and did not return it to Brian until after the trip when he left Brian with his parents in Delaware. Approximately one week later, after the Thomson family had returned to New York, the infant plaintiff Daniel Berlin was injured when he and Brian were playing with the slingshot in Daniel's backyard.

Any duty on the part of Brickley to supervise or control the activities of Brian terminated when he returned the child to his parents' custody ( see, Purdy v. Public Adm'r of County of Westchester, 72 N.Y.2d 1, 8-9; see also, Pratt v. Robinson, 39 N.Y.2d 554, 560; Griffith v. City of New York, 123 A.D.2d 830, 832). Even assuming that Brickley was negligent in returning the slingshot to Brian, the alleged negligent supervision by Brian's parents, who were fully aware that he possessed and was using the slingshot, was a superseding intervening cause which attenuated any negligence on the part of Brickley from the ultimate injury to Daniel ( see, Nolechek v. Gesuale, 46 N.Y.2d 332, 338-339; Elardo v. Town of Oyster Bay, 176 A.D.2d 912, 914). Consequently, Brickley's motion for summary judgment should have been granted. Pizzuto, J.P., Santucci, Altman and Hart, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Berlin v. Nassau County Council

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 8, 1996
229 A.D.2d 414 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

Berlin v. Nassau County Council

Case Details

Full title:RITA BERLIN et al., Respondents, v. NASSAU COUNTY COUNCIL, BOY SCOUTS OF…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jul 8, 1996

Citations

229 A.D.2d 414 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
645 N.Y.S.2d 90

Citing Cases

SHEILA C. v. Povich

A caretaker is not automatically exempt from responsibility merely because of a suspension of physical…

Sheila C. v. Povich

rol over the child's protection]; Winter v. Board of Educ. of City of N.Y., 270 AD2d 343, lv denied 95 NY2d…