From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Beplat v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 27, 1998
246 A.D.2d 471 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

January 27, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Phyllis Gangel-Jacob, J.).


It is of no moment that the prior owners, and not defendants, the present owners of the building abutting the sidewalk where the fuel oil intake valve over which plaintiff tripped is located, installed the valve in the sidewalk and that defendants have never made use of it. It is the capability of use rather than the actual use that creates liability on the basis of the abutting owner's special use ( Lombardozzi v. City of New York, 71 Misc.2d 271, 272-273). Issues of fact exist as to whether the valve, which protruded two inches above the sidewalk and was filled with cement at the time of the accident, constituted a dangerous condition on the sidewalk.

Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Ellerin, Tom and Andrias, JJ.


Summaries of

Beplat v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 27, 1998
246 A.D.2d 471 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

Beplat v. City of New York

Case Details

Full title:PATRICIA BEPLAT et al., Respondents, v. CITY OF NEW YORK, Defendant, and…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jan 27, 1998

Citations

246 A.D.2d 471 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
668 N.Y.S.2d 382

Citing Cases

Borley v. United States

Given the type of hazard involved here, an ankle-high metal bar surrounded by hard surfaces, we are confident…