From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bennrona Corporation v. Mulroney

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 9, 1938
254 App. Div. 630 (N.Y. App. Div. 1938)

Opinion

March 9, 1938.

Present — Sears, P.J., Crosby, Lewis, Cunningham and Dowling, JJ.


Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: Proof of ownership of the plaintiff's car was sufficient to establish prima facie that the person operating the car was engaged in the owner's service. ( Ferris v. Sterling, 214 N.Y. 249.) We find nothing in the record to rebut this presumption. The contributory negligence of the driver of the car as found by the jury barred a recovery. All concur. (The judgment is for defendant in an automobile negligence action. The order denies a motion for a new trial.)


Summaries of

Bennrona Corporation v. Mulroney

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 9, 1938
254 App. Div. 630 (N.Y. App. Div. 1938)
Case details for

Bennrona Corporation v. Mulroney

Case Details

Full title:BENNRONA CORPORATION, Appellant, v. LUCY MULRONEY, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Mar 9, 1938

Citations

254 App. Div. 630 (N.Y. App. Div. 1938)

Citing Cases

Schleede v. State of New York

Such evidence, however, was vague and indefinite and similarity of conditions was not shown, hence, no…

Evans v. Zimmer

Therefore, he is chargeable with the negligence of the defendant, John Evans, and would be barred from any…